Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 1, 2025Journal of Public Representative and Society ProvisionOpen Access

Government Transparency Model in Procurement of Goods and Services in Luwu Regency

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

RRR Rahman

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Qualitative analysis reveals limited public participation in procurement, indicating weaknesses in the e-procurement system.

Key Points

  • Transparency in procurement is not optimal due to a lack of public participation and weak oversight mechanisms.
  • The study identifies four dimensions affecting transparency: organizational actors, technology, management interventions, and stakeholder environment.
  • Qualitative descriptive approach using purposive sampling from procurement officials and community members supports findings.
  • Recommendations focus on strengthening information digitization and engaging the community in oversight processes.

Cite This Study

R Rahman (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69054ffa1a99e50463de6a5bhttps://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v5i3.803
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Enhancing Information Transparency for Effective Governance: A Study on Government Procurement in Indonesia2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2THE NATURE OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT OF GOODS AND SERVICESIN THE PROVINCE OF SOUTH SULAWESI2024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Procurement governance in reducing corruption in the indonesian public sector: a mixed method approach2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4Procurement Management Analysis of Goods/Service Provincial Government of Central Sulawesi2025
  5. 5Evaluating the Impact of LKPP Regulation No. 7 of 2021 on the Optimization of Functional Positions in Papua’s Procurement Bureau2025