Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis demonstrates an improved risk assessment for osteoporotic fractures in adults by utilizing national health data, indicating strong clinical applicability.
Osteoporosis is a major health concern in older individuals. Efficient case-finding is essential for timely risk assessment and treatment for high-risk patients. To prevent fractures and reduce the risk of subsequent disability, approaches offering clinically sufficient sensitivity with acceptable specificity are warranted. Although pharmaceutical osteoporosis treatment is effective, it is often diagnosed at a late stage, for instance following a fracture. The aim of this study was to extend the existing Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM), which identifies individuals at risk of an imminent (one-year) major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) based on administrative health data. This extension (FREMVer2) included data on morbidity and medications and evaluated age-specific risk cut-offs to enhance the risk assessment of MOF and hip fracture (HF) risk, respectively. We included the entire population of Denmark aged ≥45 yr at baseline (2022; N = 2 493 180), not previously diagnosed with osteoporosis or receiving osteoporosis treatment. The cohort was divided into four groups stratified by sex and age (<65 yr, ≥65 yr). Each of the four groups was randomly split into a 60% development, a 20% model validation, and a 20% cut-off validation cohort. All diagnoses from Danish hospitals and filled prescriptions from Danish pharmacies from 2007-2021 were used as possible predictors for MOF. These predictors correspond to information that in Denmark is automatically transferred to general practitioner’s electronic health records; hence, prediction would be possible in general practice. Models were constructed by logistic regression with LASSO regularization, determining the preferred regularization hyper parameter by cross-validation and forcing categorical age to be included. Across subgroups models obtained poor to acceptable AUCs of 0.656 to 0.714 for MOF, and acceptableAUCs of 0.728 to 0.764 for hip fractures, and achieved sensitivities of around than 80% or higher in almost all subgroups. This performance, together with the available predictors, makes FREMver2 a feasible decision support system as a step towards an opportunistic screening program in health care settings with access to administrative data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Möller et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: