November 4, 2025Riau Law JournalOpen Access

Legal Analysis of Self-Preferencing Conducted by Marketplace on Courier Services Based on Anti-Monopoly Law and Unfair Business Competition

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

SSSamariadi SamariadiRiau University

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

This analysis reveals self-preferencing affects consumer choice and market efficiency, implying a need for regulatory action against unfair business competition.

Key Points

Self-preferencing by marketplaces can hinder fair competition and limit consumer choice.
Marketplaces may violate laws against unfair business competition, reinforcing dominance and creating barriers.
Normative legal research addresses the implications of self-preferencing practices in the digital economy.
Regulatory oversight by KPPU is essential for promoting a balanced competitive environment.

Cite This Study

Samariadi Samariadi (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/690945348f2297dc13532e46 https://doi.org/10.30652/jy04jf58

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

This analysis reveals self-preferencing affects consumer choice and market efficiency, implying a need for regulatory action against unfair business competition.

Legal Analysis of Self-Preferencing Conducted by Marketplace on Courier Services Based on Anti-Monopoly Law and Unfair Business Competition

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Legal Analysis of Self-Preferencing Conducted by Marketplace on Courier Services Based on Anti-Monopoly Law and Unfair Business Competition

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider