Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observation reveals enhanced diagnostic efficiency for facial palsy in pediatric patients, suggesting selective MRI use based on clinical features.
Objectives: This retrospective observational study evaluated the diagnostic efficiency of routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pediatric patients with facial palsy (FP) in the emergency department (ED). Methods: Pediatric patients under 18 years of age who presented with FP at the ED of a single tertiary referral hospital between January 2010 and December 2022 were included. Clinical features were assessed and used for risk stratification, which informed the diagnostic utility of the MRI. Results: A total of 134 pediatric patients were included [mean age, 99 mo; 53.7% male (n = 72)]. Seventeen patients (12.7%) were diagnosed with central FP (CFP). Among the clinical features, additional neurological examination abnormalities emerged as the most significant risk factor for CFP (odds ratio, 86.3; P < 0.001). Risk stratification based on neurological abnormalities, underlying conditions, and associated symptoms revealed that the diagnostic utility of MRI was significantly higher in the risk group than in the no-risk group ( P < 0.001; sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 84.6%). In contrast, patients in the no-risk group who underwent MRI experienced a mean increase of 294 minutes in the ED length of stay compared with those who did not undergo imaging. Conclusions: Routine MRI is valuable for detecting CFP in pediatric patients with neurological signs. However, its use in low-risk cases may provide limited clinical benefit, prolonging ED stay and increasing unnecessary use of medical resources. Therefore, selective imaging based on clinical indicators is recommended.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: