Pilot trial shows multimodal physical therapy enhances health-related quality of life and physical activity in constipation patients, indicating potential benefits.
Goals: To investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of an 8-week multimodal physical therapy program for adults with constipation. Background: Constipation is a common multifactorial digestive disease in adults. A multimodal intervention program may better improve pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function and alleviate symptoms. Study: This pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted at a Tertiary Medical Center in Taiwan. Adults with functional constipation were recruited and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (IG) or the control group (CG). The IG received a multimodal physical therapy intervention, including therapist-guided lifestyle modification education, twice-weekly physical exercise, and pelvic floor muscle training for 8 weeks. The CG received only 1 session of lifestyle modification education after baseline assessment. Assessments were conducted at baseline and after the 8-week program. Primary outcomes included feasibility measures. Secondary outcomes comprised symptom severity, PFM function, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and physical activity levels. Results: A total of 27 participants were recruited (IG: n=14, CG: n=13). The consent rate was 65.2%, with an overall withdrawal rate of 14.8%. No adverse events were reported, and treatment satisfaction was moderate to high. After the 8-week intervention, significant improvements were observed in symptom severity ( P =0.003), PFM coordination ( P =0.011), PFM strength ( P =0.007), HRQOL ( P =0.013), and physical activity levels ( P =0.037) in the IG, whereas no significant changes were observed in the CG. Conclusions: An 8-week multimodal physical therapy intervention program appears feasible and potentially effective in improving constipation symptoms, PFM function, HRQOL, and physical activity levels in adults with constipation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: