Observational analysis reveals that innate immunity impacts viral replication in mosquitoes, highlighting specific antiviral effects for arboviruses like dengue and Zika.
One third of all emerging infectious diseases are vector-borne, with vector ecology and physiology playing key roles in determining whether viruses can access new vertebrate host species and spread globally. Innate immunity is a known barrier to virus replication in mosquito vectors that influences arboviral vector tropism. We here generated novel CRISPR-Cas9-mediated knockouts of the NF-kB family transcription factor Rel2 in Aedes aegypti-derived Aag2 cells and tested the impact on the replication of a diverse range of arboviruses in the Flaviviridae and Togaviridae families and the class Bunyaviricetes. We found that NF-kB-mediated innate immunity has broad antiviral activity against the Ae. aegypti-borne orthoflaviviruses dengue virus (DENV), yellow fever virus (YFV) and Zika virus (ZIKV) in mosquito cells. In contrast, little impact of NF-kB-loss-of-function was observed for the alphavirus chikungunya virus (CHIKV) or phlebovirus Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), indicating specificity in the antiviral effects of NF-kB-mediated immunity. By comparing orthoflaviviruses with different transmission routes (mosquito-borne, tick-borne, no known vector), we demonstrated that NF-kB-mediated immunity exerts its antiviral effects both early and late in the viral replication cycle, and that NF-kB-mediated immunity is not the only molecular barrier influencing the ability of orthoflaviviruses to replicate in Ae. aegypti cells. Overall, our work demonstrates the importance of mosquito NF-kB-mediated innate immunity in suppressing arbovirus replication, and shows that the barriers for arboviruses to adapt to new vector species are multifactorial and virus-specific. Our findings increase our understanding of the molecular barriers influencing arboviral emergence, and could inform the development of refractory mosquitoes incapable of transmitting human pathogens.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hollinghurst et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: