This framework enhances biometric identification through iris and fingerprint modalities, suggesting robust authentication methods in noisy data conditions.
Abstract: Biometric recognition is a vital technology for secure identification. However, unimodal systems often face several drawbacks, including reduced reliability in challenging demographic groups such as children, environmental constraints, and susceptibility to spoofing. To address these problems, this work presents a scalable multimodal biometric architecture that integrates fingerprint and iris modalities to enhance identification accuracy, resilience, and interpretability. In the proposed architecture, unique iris patterns are captured using a Multi-Layer Perceptron Mixer (MLP-Mixer), and concise yet discriminative fingerprint attachments are generated using a Variational Autoencoder (VAE). Using a Triplet Network to improve the distinction between real and fake samples, the matching performance is further strengthened. Appropriate blending is achievd through feacture-level fusion using a Cross-Attention Transformer, which dynamically aligns complementary iris and fingerprint embeddings. Crucially, by highlighting each feature's contribution to the final decision, Integrated Gradient (IG) are used to guarantee integritu and openness.. The efficacy of this technique is demonstrated by experiments using benchmark iris and fingerprint datasets, which achieved an overall identification accuracy of 97.8%, with Equal Error Rates (EER) of 0.6% for iris and 0.7% for fingerprints. The robustness of the suggested paradigm is demonstrated by comparison against unimodal and multimodal baselines, especially in situations involving noisy data and early-age biometric identification. These results highlight the system's usefulness for applications in safeguarding children, scalable authentication, and encrypted control of entry. In the final analysis, this study not only creates a new path for interpretable multisensory fusion but also creates the foundation for extending biometric solutions to larger populations and operational settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
S. Ramesh (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: