This analysis demonstrates that impulse control methods optimize inventory costs under phase-type disruptions, indicating critical strategies for supply chain management.
Background: The management of inventory under realistic supply chain disruptions, which are often non-exponential, challenges classical control theory. This study addresses the critical question of whether the optimality of simple base-stock policies holds under the combined influence of non-exponential disruptions and random yield. Methods: We model the system as a Piecewise Deterministic Markov Process (PDMP) with impulse control, using Phase-Type (PH) distributions to capture non-memoryless event timings. The analysis involves proving the existence of a solution to the Average Cost Optimality Equation (ACOE) via a vanishing discount approach, and the framework is validated with a numerical experiment. Results: Our primary finding is a rigorous proof that a state-dependent base-stock policy is optimal, a significant generalisation of classical theory. We establish this by demonstrating the value function’s convexity. The numerical experiment quantifies the significant cost penalties (over 12%) incurred by using simpler, memoryless models for supply disruptions. Conclusions: The study provides a crucial theoretical justification for the robustness of simple threshold-based control policies in complex, realistic settings. It highlights for managers the importance of modelling the variability of disruptions, not just their average duration, to avoid costly strategic errors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davide Castellano (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: