Observational study identifies psychosocial factors affecting psychological well-being in women with vulvodynia, highlighting emotional support needs.
Vulvodynia is a chronic vulvar pain condition that can interfere with women’s developmental processes and overall well-being. Adopting a broader perspective of women’s health informed by lifespan developmental and biopsychosocial frameworks, this study examined psychosocial factors related to the psychological well-being of Italian women with vulvodynia. Between December 2023 and December 2024, a total of 533 women diagnosed with vulvodynia completed an online survey. The survey included questions about sociodemographics and the illness, as well as validated measures of dyadic adjustment, social support, self-efficacy, perceived stress, and psychological well-being. Descriptive statistics, group comparisons, Pearson correlations, and hierarchical multiple regressions were performed. Nearly two-thirds of the women reported symptoms lasting over five years, and 44% experienced severe pain. Those with more intense pain, longer symptom duration, or delayed diagnosis reported lower well-being and higher stress. Satisfaction with treatment was linked to greater well-being. Psychological well-being was strongly correlated with social support, dyadic adjustment, and psychological resources. Regression analyses identified younger age, higher pain intensity, lower treatment satisfaction, reduced social support, lower self-efficacy, and greater stress as predictors of poorer psychological well-being. Vulvodynia should be considered a psychosocial and developmental challenge as well as a medical condition. These findings underscore the importance of viewing vulvodynia as not only a medical condition, but also a psychosocial and developmental challenge within women’s broader health trajectories, highlighting the need for interventions that address pain and provide structured emotional support to strengthen psychological and relational resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rosa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: