Mixed-methods study reveals distinct user profiles among older adults interacting with socially assistive robots, indicating predictors of engagement.
This study examined how older adults engage with socially assistive robots (SARs) using a mixed-methods approach that integrated survey data, behavioral logs, and conversational data. Among 191 participants aged 65 and older, 40.8% actively interacted with the Hyodol SAR. Discriminant analysis identified education level, life satisfaction, and early usage frequency as key predictors of engagement. K-means clustering revealed three distinct user profiles: Social Engagers , who prioritized emotional connection despite low self-esteem; Independent Reflectors , who exhibited self-sufficiency with minimal social interaction; and Emotionally Expressive Users , who formed strong emotional bonds with the Hyodol SAR. In the predictive models, religious affiliation and marital status were key indicators for Social Engagers; smartphone proficiency and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) for Independent Reflectors; and subjective health status for Emotionally Expressive Users.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: