This study demonstrates effective pollutant removal in domestic sewage using iron-carbon micro-electrolysis materials, suggesting energy-efficient solutions.
This study systematically evaluated the removal performance of iron–carbon (Fe/C) micro-electrolysis materials with different proportions and preparation methods for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) in domestic sewage. This study investigated the effects of different Fe/C ratios, hydraulic retention time (HRT), raw materials and sintering bonding conditions on the efficiency of domestic sewage treatment through both static and dynamic experiments. In the static experiments, iron filings (IFs), steel slag (SS), and coconut shell carbon (CSC) were physically mixed, whereas the dynamic tests simulated the continuous treatment of domestic sewage. The results indicated that the Fe/C materials effectively removed P, particularly materials with high Fe/C ratios, which achieved removal rates of 96–98%. The COD removal efficiency of low Fe/C ratio material was better, reaching a removal rate of more than 70% under the optimal conditions. For Fe/C physical mixed materials, SS replacing IFs had excellent performance in ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N) removal (>93%), but other indicators were poor, which limited its application. Results from the continuous flow experiment indicated that the physically mixed filler with an Fe/C mass ratio of 2:1 showed excellent and stable TP and COD removal rates (98.6% and 92.8%) for the actual domestic sewage. In addition, the Fe/C micro-electrolysis filler sintered at 400 °C using kaolin as a binder exhibited good potential for pollutant removal, providing a feasible solution for reducing energy consumption. This study provides important data support for the development of low-cost and efficient decentralized rural sewage treatment technology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: