The PRIME DIEP flap demonstrates successful outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction, indicating reduced complications and improved muscle preservation.
Background Following its initial description in 1994, the DIEP flap has become the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. While sequential modifications have improved patient outcomes, functional donor site morbidity, abdominal bulge and hernia remain a challenge. Techniques such as robotic surgery show promise in mitigating these issues but are limited by the need for specialized equipment and training. Methods The PRIME (Paramedian Reflection for Innervated Muscle Enhancement) DIEP flap is a novel technique that preserves innervated rectus muscle and minimizes fascial disruption without requiring robotic assistance for flap harvest. Patient selection is based on preoperative imaging, identifying a suitable dominant medial row perforator(s) with short intramuscular course. A limited fascial incision over the perforator, followed by a paramedian fascial extension, medial reflection of the rectus abdominis, and submuscular pedicle dissection allows for safe visualization while minimizing abdominal wall morbidity. Results Between June 2023 and February 2025, 15 patients underwent 18 PRIME DIEP flaps. All flaps survived, with one patient requiring reoperation for hematoma. There were no flap losses, readmissions, or donor site complications, such as bulge or hernia, at 30-day follow-up. 72.2% of flap were based on a single perforator, with an average flap weight of 631.7 grams. Conclusion The PRIME DIEP flap represents the next evolution in autologous breast reconstruction by offering a reproducible, muscle- and nerve-sparing technique, enhancing abdominal wall function in suitable patients. This technical modification also allows for incorporation of the fascial closure in a midline plication improving fascial vascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McGarry et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: