Ethnographic insights reveal coping strategies and tension management during AI implementation in radiology, suggesting adaptation in professional practices.
This study examines psychological processes during narrow-task artificial intelligence (NT-AI) implementation in radiological practice, focusing on how professionals cope with tensions arising from discrepancies between intended and experienced expertise practices with NT-AI. Such tensions may hold a particular threat to professionals’ sense of agency (SoA) and are therefore particularly important to address in a process of AI implementation. Using ethnographic methods across two Danish hospitals, we observe professionals’ typical coping strategies to core experiences of tension-based challenges: disruption, re-validation, vigilance, rejection, and practice transformation. We analyze these coping responses based on a typology of four distinct ideal types of human-AI collaboration: Parallel expertise, Forwarded expertise, Augmented expertise, and Collective expertise. Our study contributes to a nuanced understanding of human-AI collaboration by demonstrating how professionals adaptively navigate between these ideal types to transform their professional practice and reconstitute their SoA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Galsgaard et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: