Experimental analysis shows GFRP reinforcement improves ductility in composite columns, suggesting a durable alternative to steel.
Corrosion continues to be a major challenge affecting the service life, safety and durability of steel-reinforced concrete (RC) structures. The deterioration of steel not only reduces structural capacity but also increases long-term maintenance costs. To address this limitation, glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) is being investigated as an alternative to conventional steel reinforcement, particularly in aggressive environments. This work examines the behavior of composite columns reinforced with GFRP bars with steel stirrups. Sixteen square columns of 150 × 150 × 850 mm dimensions, cast with M30 grade concrete, were reinforced using either GFRP or steel, while varying stirrup spacing and bar diameters. Experimental observations showed that GFRP reinforcement contributed about 10–12% of the ultimate capacity of the columns. A marked enhancement in load carrying capacity of GFRP-RC columns was obtained with closer stirrup spacing. The axial strength of GFRP-reinforced columns was comparable to steel-reinforced ones with the same main reinforcement ratio. Ductility increased by 12% when stirrup spacing was reduced. The difference between analytical and experimental values ranged between 12% and 15%, whereas experimental and numerical results differed by 10–12%. Based on these results, a modification factor derived from IS 456:2000 is proposed for predicting the capacity of ‘GFRP-reinforced’ columns. The outcomes clearly highlight the potential of GFRP reinforcement as a durable, sustainable and practical substitute for conventional steel reinforcement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kinjawadekar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: