This literature review compares wound-rotor synchronous motors to induction and permanent-magnet motors, highlighting design and optimization methods for electric traction systems.
Synchronous motors with a field winding in the rotor, known as wound-rotor synchronous motors (WRSMs) or electrically excited synchronous motors (EESMs), are claimed to be a good alternative to induction motors and even permanent-magnet synchronous motors (PMSMs) in electric traction applications. WRSMs do not require expensive rare-earth magnets and potentially have high power and torque density, and lower inverter power and cost, especially in applications demanding a wide constant-power speed range. Designing WRSMs for electric traction imposes some challenges and requires careful analysis. This paper provides an overview of commercial WRSMs for ground electric transport over the past 40 years, a comparison of WRSMs with other types of electric motors suitable for electric traction, and an overview of optimization methods and brushless excitation technologies for such machines. The goals of this paper are to present and discuss design approaches for traction WRSMs, to benchmark WRSMs against other motor types used in ground electric transport, and to highlight the most promising WRSM topologies and design techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prakht et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: