Numerical analysis reports up to 11.80% drag reduction in vehicles with air jets, indicating improved energy efficiency for automotive applications.
This paper presents a numerical investigation into aerodynamic drag reduction by air jets for a realistic DrivAer estateback vehicle model. Numerical simulations are conducted based on Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations with a shear stress transport k-ω turbulence model, for optimizing the drag reduction with seven individual rear slot jets and their combination. The results demonstrate that the jets located at the upper and lower edges of the rear end could achieve the highest individual drag reduction of up to 4.82%, by suppressing recirculation bubbles, delaying flow separation, and promoting pressure recovery. The jet positioned at the lower lateral side of vehicle base reduces the drag by 4.14% through the control of the underbody vortex. Moderate performance is observed for other individual jets within the wake flow. The underlying mechanisms are elucidated by detailed analyses of wake flow fields and rear-end surface pressure distributions. On this basis, optimal performance is obtained by a multi-jet combination, incorporating the best vertical jet and three better horizontal jets, which collectively yield a remarkable 11.80% drag reduction with high energy efficiency. This work confirms that the active flow control by the rear air jets can greatly improve the aerodynamic efficiency for realistic vehicles, providing a practical approach for drag reduction in modern automotive applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: