Analysis reveals insights on media and authorship in reading practices of Mary Hamilton, highlighting the role of qualitative methods.
This article evaluates the benefits and drawbacks of using quantitative digital analysis to reconstruct eighteenth‐century reading practices using manuscript life writing. Our corpus is over a thousand pages of Mary Hamilton's letters and diary entries covering one year of her life. We report significant findings concerning the space, time, nature, and mode of Hamilton's reading, and the media, genre, authorship, and provenance of her material. Her reading diet is more dominated by female‐authored manuscript prose, inflected by personal acquaintance, and reliant on a private loan economy than we anticipated — conclusions that we would not have reached using qualitative analysis alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coulombeau et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: