Retrospective study estimates direct medical costs of COVID-19 hospitalisation, highlighting human resources impact and preparedness implications.
Background COVID – 19 has had a profound impact on the economy, health systems within countries, and individuals around the world. To provide insight that may enhance the preparedness for future pandemics, a comprehensive cost assessment is vital. This study aims to estimate the direct cost of illness (CoI), as well as the national burden of treating hospitalised COVID-19 patients. Methods This study is prevalence-based retrospective study containing all patients admitted to a single designated hospital in Kuwait for the treatment of COVID-19. Micro (bottom-up) and macro (top-down) costing methods were used to evaluate direct medical CoI from a hospital perspective. Cost components were grouped as consumables, equipment, and human resources, and sensitivity analysis was used to account for uncertainty of inputs. The cost per admission was reported in local currency and international dollars (PPP$). Results Data on 7569 patients was analysed, 52.8% of whom were male, 69.2% were above 41 years, 22% had previously vaccinated for COVID-19, 22% were admitted to the ICU, and 18% had ≥ 3 pre-existing comorbidities. The mean CoI per admission was 12,063 PPP$, with overheads accounting for 45% of this figure, while consumables, human resources, and equipment accounted for 30%, 19%, and 7%, respectively. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated that overall cost uncertainty was primarily driven by variations in human resource costs rather than by uncertainties related to personal protective equipment (PPE) or ventilator use. Conclusion The substantial economic impact of COVID-19 on Kuwait’s healthcare system has emphasised the significant role human resource costs has on overall expenditure. These findings provide valuable insights for future pandemic preparedness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: