Analysis shows deep learning models improve radionuclide identification in energy spectra, indicating greater accuracy and efficiency.
The rapid and accurate identification of radionuclides and the quantitative analysis of their activities have long been key research areas in the field of nuclear spectrum data processing. Traditional nuclear spectrum analysis methods heavily rely on manual feature extraction, making them highly susceptible to interference from factors such as energy resolution, calibration drift, and spectral peak overlap when dealing with complex mixed-radionuclide spectra, ultimately leading to degraded identification performance and accuracy. Based on multi-nuclide energy spectral data acquired via Geant4 simulation, this study compares the performance of partial least squares regression (PLSR), random forest (RF), a convolutional neural network (CNN), and a hybrid CNN–Meta model for radionuclide identification and quantitative activity analysis under conditions of raw energy spectra, Z-score normalization, and min-max normalization. To maximize the potential of each model, principal component selection, Bayesian hyperparameter optimization, iteration tuning, and meta-learning optimization were employed. Model performance was comprehensively evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean relative error (MRE), and computational time. The results demonstrate that deep learning models can effectively capture nonlinear relationships within complex energy spectra, enabling accurate radionuclide identification and activity quantification. Specifically, the CNN achieved a globally optimal test RMSE of 0.00566 and an R2 of 0.999 with raw energy spectra. CNN–Meta exhibited superior adaptability and generalization under min-max normalization, reducing test error by 70.8% compared to RF, while requiring only 49% of the total computation time of the CNN model. RF was relatively insensitive to preprocessing but yielded higher absolute errors, whereas PLSR was limited by its linear nature and failed to capture the nonlinear characteristics of complex energy spectra. In conclusion, the CNN–Meta hybrid model demonstrates superior performance in both accuracy and efficiency, providing a reliable and effective approach for the rapid identification of radionuclides and quantitative analysis of activity in complex energy spectra.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: