Analysis shows network embedding enhances venture capital networks in China, highlighting self-organization and market-oriented factors.
Despite the underdeveloped formal institutional system in China’s capital market, the venture capital (VC) industry has continued to grow rapidly, exhibiting a clear trend of network formation. To better understand the formation of VC networks, this study systematically analyzes factors from three dimensions: endogenous network structures, multidimensional relational networks among VC firms, and informal networks of venture capitalists. Using data from the Wind database and other sources, networks are constructed based on 1317 investment events involving 157 VC firms. An exponential random graph model is applied to assess the effects of multiple network embeddings on VC network formation. The results reveal that, among endogenous structural factors, triad closure structures are more likely to be embedded in VC networks than two-path structures with brokerage functions. In terms of exogenous factors, the geographic distance network among VC firms exerts a negative effect on VC network formation, while knowledge proximity networks—i.e., those based on industry, investment stage, and region—positively influence VC networks formation. Informal networks of venture capitalists increase the probability of VC network formation. Compared with previous studies, this research is based on self-organization, market-oriented, and relational logics, integrating multiple factors—including endogenous network structures, venture capital firm characteristics, and venture capitalists—and introduces a cross-network perspective to build a novel multilevel network embedding ERGM framework to examine VC network formation. Furthermore, the study reveals how informal ties substitute for formal institutions in China’s VC network formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: