The system dynamics model assesses suicide prevention impacts in veterans, highlighting effective strategies and funding implications.
Veteran suicide remains a critical public health crisis in the United States, with rates nearly twice those of the general population. Addressing this challenge requires multiple evidence-based interventions across settings. This paper presents a system dynamics model developed within the Face the Fight™ veteran suicide prevention initiative to evaluate and optimize strategies from 2022 to 2032. The model integrates peer-reviewed evidence on intervention effectiveness, subject-matter expert calibration, and annual updates from Veterans Affairs and grantee data to estimate the potential population-level impact of suicide prevention. The model organizes veterans by levels of suicide distress and estimates the impact of interventions in an initial three target areas aligned with a public health approach to suicide prevention: creating protective environments (e.g., secure firearm storage), strengthening access and delivery of suicide care (e.g., suicide-specific clinical programs), and identifying and supporting people at risk (e.g., suicide screening). Model results indicate that focusing solely on high-distress veterans is insufficient to reduce suicide rates to those of the general population, while balanced portfolios combining clinical, community, and firearm-safety approaches yield the greatest projected benefit. Sensitivity analyses demonstrate the model’s responsiveness to population distress distributions and intervention capacities, underscoring the need for a balanced, scalable strategy. Evaluating suicide-prevention impact is inherently challenging, but the model provides a dynamic and transparent framework for assessing investment effectiveness, refining strategies, and forecasting long-term outcomes. Its adaptability ensures ongoing insights to guide funding priorities, informs data-driven policy, and extends to other populations and public health challenges where multiple interventions interact to influence outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chichakly et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: