Analysis shows inclusive D0 production in heavy-ion collisions, suggesting new insights into photon-nucleus interactions.
We compute the inclusive <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:msup> <a:mi>D</a:mi> <a:mn>0</a:mn> </a:msup> </a:math> production cross section in ultraperipheral Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC as a function of the <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:msup> <c:mi>D</c:mi> <c:mn>0</c:mn> </c:msup> </c:math> transverse momentum and rapidity. These calculations are carried out within the new generalized photon-nucleus FONLL ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mrow> <e:mi mathvariant="normal">G</e:mi> <e:mi>γ</e:mi> <e:mi mathvariant="normal">A</e:mi> <e:mtext>−</e:mtext> <e:mi>FONLL</e:mi> </e:mrow> </e:math> ) framework, which can predict photonuclear cross sections for charm and beauty hadrons in electron-proton, electron-nucleus, and ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions. The framework relies on fixed-order next-to-leading logarithm (FONLL) to model heavy-quark production in photonuclear collisions and employs a photon-flux reweighting procedure to describe the production cross sections in ultraperipheral heavy-ion collisions. The <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mrow> <i:mi mathvariant="normal">G</i:mi> <i:mi>γ</i:mi> <i:mi mathvariant="normal">A</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:math> calculations are first validated against the photoproduction cross sections of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:msup> <m:mi>D</m:mi> <m:mo>*</m:mo> </m:msup> </m:math> in electron-proton collisions at HERA. The predictions for the <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msup> <o:mi>D</o:mi> <o:mn>0</o:mn> </o:msup> </o:math> production cross section in ultraperipheral Pb-Pb collisions at the LHC are then presented and compared to the first experimental results obtained by CMS at <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:mrow> <q:mrow> <q:msqrt> <q:mrow> <q:msub> <q:mrow> <q:mi mathvariant="normal">s</q:mi> </q:mrow> <q:mrow> <q:mi>NN</q:mi> </q:mrow> </q:msub> </q:mrow> </q:msqrt> <q:mo>=</q:mo> <q:mn>5.36</q:mn> <q:mtext> </q:mtext> <q:mtext> </q:mtext> </q:mrow> <q:mi>TeV</q:mi> </q:mrow> </q:math> . The predictions are benchmarked against different choices of nuclear parton distribution functions, fragmentation functions, and renormalization and factorization scales.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cacciari et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: