Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The conversation explores moral economy principles in housing provision, highlighting impacts of privatisation and neoliberalism on inequalities in Scandinavia.
Housing is crucial for people to flourish, as it is more than shelter and physical infrastructure. The conversation discusses trajectories and ‘variegations’ in universal, decommodified, non-profit housing provision in Scandinavian countries, focusing on Sweden ( allmännyttan ) and Denmark ( almen). It explores how Sweden’s municipal rental housing was transformed by neoliberal market fundamentalism, while the Danish tenant-owned housing associations turned out to be more resilient to neoliberal reforms. The conversation’s second part discusses the potential of a moral economy perspective to enrich our understanding of contemporary transformations. Such a perspective involves reintroducing moral arguments pointing towards a sustainable organisation of livelihoods, not least with regard to privatisation, individualisation and financialisation and their impact on inequalities. A moral economy approach allows to broaden the objects of study, moving towards an integrated analysis of habitation, including sustainable and caring neighbourhoods, by transcending academic habits of myopic disciplinary isolation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clark et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: