Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mixed-methods analysis reveals that shifting to commodity production drives labor deskilling and quality loss in construction, highlighting threats to high-road labor models.
The Swedish building industry has been going through a neoliberal transformation from community building to commodity production. In this article, we employ mixed-methods research aiming at addressing what this structural transformation entails and what its (adverse) effects may be. Based on a contemporary historical materialist approach, we draw on the principal contradiction in the labor theory of value and the respective contradictions in housing commodification and production fragmentation to conceptualize an integrated framework (referred to as a triaxial threat space), which we then situate in the socio-historical context of the Swedish building industry. Finally, we employ this framework and demonstrate how the structural transformation from community building to commodity production is threatening the famed Swedish high-road model, leading, among others, to labor deskilling and exploitation, lower productivity, and production quality issues. We also posit that these phenomena are exacerbated when moving towards the extremes of fully exploiting labor for profit, universally commodifying housing production, and completely fragmenting production through multilayered subcontracting. Our contributions include integrating relevant scholarship into a coherent framework for understanding transformations in housing production and labor relations in Sweden, as well as linking labor degradation and the potential collapse of high-road production with the gradual change in the political economy of Swedish construction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kifokeris et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: