Analysis reveals micro-drilling excels in material removal rate and EDM offers superior surface quality in stainless steel.
Micro machining techniques are widely used for manufacturing miniature precision components in biomedical, aerospace, and electronics applications. This study compares micro-holes (800 µm) in AM 17-4 PH stainless steel fabricated by micro-drilling and electrical discharge machining (EDM). Key parameters evaluated include material removal rate (MRR), overcut, taper angle, circularity, and surface roughness. Micro-drilling employed a solid carbide drill with Ti–Al–N coating, while EDM used a copper electrode. Nine holes were produced with each method and analyzed. Micro-drilling achieved a significantly higher MRR of 1.955 mm 3 /min and a lower overcut of 0.011 mm, while EDM recorded a taper angle as low as 0.021° and circularity of 0.987. Additionally, EDM produced a superior surface roughness of 0.11 µm compared to 0.33 µm for micro-drilling. Overall, micro-drilling excels in machining speed and dimensional accuracy, while EDM offers better geometric precision and surface quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthuvan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: