Laboratory study reveals fine particles influence water storage capacity in capillary barrier covers, suggesting optimal particle ratios for performance.
Capillary barrier covers (CBCs) have gained widespread application as engineered surface layers in landfill systems, agricultural water retention infrastructures, and slope protection designs due to their superior water storage capacity and lateral drainage characteristics. During the long-term service of CBCs, fine particles may enter into the coarse-grained layer, which affects the water storage capacity and even causes CBCs to fail. Therefore, this study investigated the influence of admixing different types of soils (into the coarse-grained layer) and their proportions on water storage capacity through laboratory soil column experiments. The results indicate the following: (1) A method is proposed to determine the failure of the capillary barrier by utilizing the variation pattern of volumetric water content (VWC) at the fine–coarse-grained layer interface. (2) An effective capillary barrier can only be formed if the saturated permeability coefficient of the coarse-grained layer is at least one order of magnitude greater than that of the fine-grained layer. (3) When the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the fine particles incorporated into the coarse-grained layer is less than 10−5 cm/s, the matric potential of the fine-grained layer consistently exhibits a CBC line type. When the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the fine particles is greater than 10−5 cm/s, the matric potential of the fine-grained layer shows a homogeneous line type at an incorporation ratio of 1:0.6. (4) When the particle size of the fine particles mixed into the coarse-grained layer (quartz sand, silt, and diatomite with admixture ratios of 1:0.1, 1:0.3, 1:0.6, and 1:1) is smaller than that of the particles in the fine-grained layer, the water storage capacity of CBCs is only affected by the proportion of fine particles added to the coarse-grained layer and is independent of the type of fine particle used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: