Review explores advancements in AI applications within archaeology, suggesting implications for data integration and knowledge reasoning.
Large Language Models (LLMs) and Multimodal Models (LMMs) are significantly influencing scientific research, including archaeology—a discipline dealing with uniquely complex, multimodal data. This comprehensive review systematically examines recent (2023+) applications of LLMs/LMMs in archaeology, covering ancient texts, artifacts, field data, and knowledge graphs. While current applications are often exploratory and fragmented, they demonstrate substantial potential for addressing long-standing archaeological challenges such as data heterogeneity, knowledge integration, and interpretive complexity. We argue that archaeology serves as a valuable “proving ground” for next-generation AI technologies due to its distinctive data characteristics (multimodal heterogeneity, sparsity, uncertainty) and high demands for robust knowledge reasoning and interpretability. This review critically analyzes technical approaches including fine-tuning methods (LoRA, PEFT), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and recent advances (RAFT, LongRoPE, Phi-3-mini) that enable efficient local deployment. We examine data, knowledge, technological, and ethical challenges, distinguishing between issues generic to machine learning and those specific to Transformer-based LLMs in heritage contexts. This review concludes by identifying prioritized future research directions for integrated “AI Archaeology,” emphasizing responsible AI principles and human-in-the-loop frameworks. This study offers cross-disciplinary insights for fostering deep, synergistic, and ethically sound AI integration within archaeological science and broader cultural heritage applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: