Epidemiologic Characteristics Determining the Choice of Direct-Acting Antiviral Therapy in HCV Patients: An Italian Real-World Evidence Study

Pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (pDAAs) have transformed hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. In Italy, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) are available. While both show similar efficacy, differences in patient profiles and potential drug–drug interactions (DDIs) may influence treatment choice. This study examined factors affecting pDAA selection and potential prescribing gaps. Using administrative databases (2018–2023) covering 3.7 million citizens, HCV patients were divided into SOF/VEL and GLE/PIB cohorts and compared by demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data. Among 5565 patients, 2837 (51%) received SOF/VEL and 2728 (49%) received GLE/PIB. SOF/VEL patients were older (60.8 vs. 57.6 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities: diabetes (24% vs. 17%), mental disorders (22% vs. 14%), cancer (14% vs. 9%), and cardiovascular disease (31% vs. 22%). Hospitalization rates were higher (19% vs. 13%), as were exemption codes for chronic hepatitis (58% vs. 50%) and hypertension (32% vs. 23%). Polypharmacy was more common with SOF/VEL; 25% used ≥10 non-pDAA drugs (vs. 17%), and mean medications per patient were higher (6.3 ± 5.6 vs. 4.9 ± 5.2). SOF/VEL was often used for older, frailer patients, likely due to a more favourable DDI profile. These prescribing trends highlight the importance of tailoring pDAA choice to patient comorbidity profiles, ensuring appropriate and individualized HCV treatment.