Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reveals vehicle speed monitoring in tunnels with 98% accuracy, indicating the effectiveness of YOLOv8 and Kalman filtering.
Tunnels serve as a critical hub in urban transportation networks; their monotonous and enclosed environment is prone to inducing speeding behavior, necessitating an efficient vehicle speed monitoring system. Traditional methods suffer from high costs and slow response times, making them inadequate for the complex scenarios encountered in tunnel environments. This study proposes a real-time tunnel vehicle speed monitoring system based on YOLOv8s and DeepSORT. YOLOv8s is used to detect and classify cars, trucks, and buses, while DeepSORT applies Kalman filtering and the Hungarian algorithm to construct motion trajectories. Vehicle speed is estimated through perspective geometric transformation combined with a sliding-window approach, with a speeding threshold of 100 km/h and corresponding visual alerts. Using surveillance video from an expressway tunnel as the dataset, the system achieved detection accuracies of 98% for cars, 96% for trucks, and 91% for buses. Speed detection performance metrics included an average speed deviation (ASD) of 2.54 km/h, a deviation degree of vehicle speed (DDVS) of 3.12, vehicle speed stability (VST) of 1.22, and speed difference ratio (SDR) of 2.9%. Analysis revealed a longitudinal “deceleration–acceleration–deceleration” inverted U-shaped speed profile along the tunnel. Statistical tests confirmed these findings: the Mann–Whitney U test showed highly significant differences in vehicle speeds between cars and trucks across different tunnel sections, and the Kruskal–Wallis test further indicated significant speed variations across the entrance, middle, and exit segments for both vehicle types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: