Research highlights that wetlands support ecosystem health and population recovery of aerial insectivores, indicating their conservation is vital.
Aerial insectivores have experienced steep population declines in North America, with an estimated loss of nearly 160 million individuals since the 1970s. Agricultural intensification, habitat loss, pesticide use, extreme climatic events, and loss of high-quality insect prey are all threats to aerial insectivore populations worldwide. Several species within the guild breed sympatrically or co-occur in agricultural areas, and thus aerial insectivores can act as indicators of ecosystem health within agricultural landscapes. Here, we highlight the valuable contributions of new research published as part of a Special Feature series on “Aerial Insectivores Breeding in Agricultural Landscapes”. In reviewing this research and the broader literature on aerial insectivores, we developed the hypothesis that habitat heterogeneity, and especially wetlands, support aerial insectivores breeding in agricultural landscapes. Importantly, wetlands are a source of emergent aquatic insects, and these high-quality prey items have been found in the diets of several species, including those of conservation concern. We provide evidence that (1) aerial insectivores use wetland habitats for foraging and roosting while breeding in agricultural landscapes; (2) wetlands improve the health, reproductive success, or fitness prospects of aerial insectivores; and, importantly, (3) wetlands may offset the negative effects of agricultural intensification. While evidence for the benefits of wetlands to aerial insectivores is biased toward breeding swallows in the Canadian Prairies, the higher nutritional value of insects emerging from wetlands and other aquatic sources points to the widespread value of wetlands for aerial insectivores in North America. Overall, protecting wetland habitat may be critically important for the conservation of healthy aerial insectivore populations in agricultural landscapes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berzins et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: