Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Revision total hip arthroplasty improves pain relief and infection control in geriatric patients with bone defects.
Revision total hip arthroplasty with massive femoral and acetabular bone loss plus chronic periprosthetic joint infection is formidable in geriatric patients. A 73-year-old woman managed with a staged, soft-tissue-first pathway: extensive debridement, targeted antibiotics, and dead-space/coverage optimization, followed by defect-specific re-reconstruction. The acetabulum was rebuilt with a porous cup–cage anchored in reliable host bone; cavitary defects were buttressed with antibiotic-loaded cement. The femur was reconstructed using a modular tapered, fluted stem achieving diaphyseal fixation, with distal interlocking to enhance torsional control in a short, compromised isthmus. At 10 months, the patient had marked pain relief, community ambulation with a cane, and no reinfection, dislocation, or stem subsidence; radiographs demonstrated a stable cup–cage and maintained hip center. Although the techniques are established, this report highlights a pragmatic sequence integrating infection control, soft-tissue readiness, and fixation choices in a frail host, offering practical decision points for similarly complex re-revisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vũ et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: