Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analysis shows varying effectiveness and durability of antibody responses in homologous versus heterologous COVID-19 vaccinations.
Description During the COVID-19 pandemic, vaccines were developed based on various platform technologies and approved for emergency use. However, the comparative analysis of immunogenicity and the durability of vaccine-induced antibody responses depending on vaccine platforms or vaccination regimen have not been thoroughly examined for mRNA- or viral vector-based vaccines. Here we assessed spike-binding IgG levels and neutralizing capacity in 69 vaccinated individuals prime-boost immunized either by homologous (BNT162b2-BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1-ChAdOx1) vaccinations or heterologous (ChAdOx1-BNT162b2) vaccination for 6 months after the first vaccination. We found stronger induction and relatively rapid waning of antibody responses by the homologous vaccination of the mRNA vaccine, while weaker boost effect and stable maintenance of humoral immune responses in the viral vector vaccine group. Heterologous vaccination of ChAdOx1 and BNT162b2 resulted in the effective boost effect with the highest remaining antibody responses at 6 month post-primary vaccination.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong In Kim (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: