Demonstrates enhanced anti-tumor efficacy in melanoma by targeting MHC antigen presentation in dendritic cell vaccines, suggesting improved immunity.
Description Dendritic cell (DC) cancer vaccines have underperformed as cancer therapies, possibly due to the use of suboptimal DC populations and targeting non-mutant MHC class I (MHC-I) antigens rather than tumor-specific MHC-I and MHC-II neoantigens. CD103+ type 1 DCs (DC1s) can cross-present tumor antigens to CD8 T cells and receive a CD40-dependent licensing signal when presenting MHC-II antigens to CD4 T cells, which enhances their survival and expression of MHC and T cell costimulatory molecules. However, in a DC1 vaccine context, it is unknown whether or how MHC-I and MHC-II neoantigen presentation shapes T cell responses and vaccine efficacy. To investigate this, we used DC1 neoantigen vaccines and a melanoma model expressing MHC-I and MHC-II model neoantigens to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy of WT, MHC-I-deficient, and MHC-II-deficient DC1 vaccines. Our results show DC1 vaccines require presentation of both MHC-I and MHC-II antigens on the same cell for full therapeutic efficacy. Additionally, in vitro stimulation of DC1s with polyI:C and αCD40 induced expression of CD70, 4-1BBL, and the anti-apoptotic transcript Bcl2l1, suggesting MHC-II neoantigen presentation to CD4 T cells by DC1 vaccines is critical for their CD40-dependent licensing, enhanced T cell costimulation, and survival. Overall, these data highlight the importance of both MHC-I and MHC-II antigen presentation and CD40 licensing by DC1 vaccines for optimal anti-tumor immunity. Funding Sources NCI R01CA282027, CPRIT RR190017, 2R56AI109294-06A1, Johnson & Johnson Scholars of Immunology Diversity and Engagement Program.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pineda et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: