Analysis reveals economic transformation impacts and critiques Polish hegemonic masculinity in Witkowski's novel.
<ns3:p> The article presents Michał Witkowski’s novel <ns3:italic>Lubiewo</ns3:italic> ( <ns3:italic>Lovetown</ns3:italic> , 2005) as an unconsciously political novel. In order to do so, I take a critical approach to the basic epistemological distinction contained in this novel between <ns3:italic>gej/ciota</ns3:italic> (gay/faggot) by analysing subsequent novels that refer to <ns3:italic>Lovetown</ns3:italic> , in particular <ns3:italic>Fyn fund cwancy</ns3:italic> ś ( <ns3:italic>Twentyfive</ns3:italic> , 2015) and a privately published autofictional novel entitled <ns3:italic>One Hundred Dogs for Killing a Crab. A Cuban Diary</ns3:italic> (circa 2018). The article argues that the translation of this distinction (gay/ciota) into the ‘queer versus gay’ opposition, recognisable in theory (especially in the US), leads to misinterpretation and distorts the Eastern European context of economic transformation. Deconstructive analysis shows that the political aspect of Witkowski’s work can be found particularly in his critique of Polish hegemonic masculinity and his critique of the economic dimension of Poland’s neoliberal transformation. </ns3:p>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Błażej Warkocki (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: