This analysis demonstrates improved fitting of loss distributions in insurance, suggesting that generalization of lognormal and pareto tails can enhance accuracy.
Fitting loss distributions in insurance is sometimes a dilemma: either you get a good fit for the small/medium losses or for the very large losses. To be able to get both at the same time, this paper studies generalisations and extensions of the Pareto model that initially look like, for example, the Lognormal distribution but have a Pareto or GPD tail. We design a classification of such spliced distributions, which embraces and generalises various existing approaches. Special attention is paid to the geometry of distribution functions and to intuitive interpretations of the parameters, which can ease parameter inference from scarce data. The developed framework gives also new insights into the old Riebesell (power curve) exposure rating method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Fackler (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: