Meta-analysis shows tenecteplase improves outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients, suggesting its safety and efficacy.
Background Whether to use tenecteplase for acute ischemic stroke patients in the extended window has so far been little studied. Methods In this meta‐analysis, we included all the randomized controlled trials comparing tenecteplase with control at 4.5 to 24 h after the last known well of acute ischemic stroke with large vessel occlusion. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, up to 12th June, 2024. Our primary outcome was an excellent functional outcome with a modified Rankin scale score (mRS) of 0–1 at 90 days. Our safety outcomes included mRS 5–6 at 90 days, mortality within 90 days, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and parenchymal hematoma Type 2. Results Ultimately, three studies involving 1198 patients were included in the pooled analysis, where tenecteplase exhibited a higher rate of mRS 0–1 at 90 days (OR, 1.36; 95%CI, 1.07–1.75; p = 0.01) and recanalization (OR, 3.30; 95%CI, 1.59–6.84; p = 0.001). For other outcomes, no significant differences were found between groups. Conclusions: This meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials manifested that tenecteplase within a 4.5‐ to 24‐h time window of large vessel occlusion stroke was superior to control for an excellent functional outcome (mRS 0–1) without safety concerns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: