Analysis shows need for quality governance in youth justice, highlighting lessons from patient safety in healthcare.
The safety and quality of youth justice services across Australia have for some years now been the subject of concern, with numerous recommendations put forward to strengthen service delivery. However, there remains no accepted mechanism to assess the quality of services, with current approaches relying on risk elimination and containment strategies—often after an adverse incident has taken place. We contrast this with contemporary approaches to patient safety in healthcare which are more proactive and framed around the development of a culture in which quality is maintained, concluding that the reform of youth justice services in Australia could proceed at a faster rate if nationally consistent, coordinated and mutually accepted approaches to quality governance were to be applied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butcher et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: