This response highlights societal transformations regarding rural revitalisation, toxicity, and ecological crisis, suggesting shifts in ethics of care.
This response engages Chen et al.'s (2025) intervention into our planetary rural geographies framework, which rethinks rural-urban relations through material and more-than-human agencies. We welcome their emphasis on infrastructure's role, particularly in China's rural construction movement. Extending this, we highlight how materials – chemicals, soils, atmospheric elements – shape uneven planetary transformations. Drawing from metabolic politics and critical agrarian studies, we trace how earthly substances entangle rural assemblages in toxicity, dispossession, and ecological crisis. While rural revitalisation proliferates globally, we caution against anthropocentric models that reproduce harm. Instead, we call for ethics of care rooted in human-nonhuman reciprocity, land stewardship, and intergenerational solidarity – advancing the planetary rural geographies agenda through attention to more-than-human entanglements and shared planetary responsibilities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: