This study demonstrates CSR and brand equity mitigate financial losses in crises, indicating cultural socio-cognition impacts risk management.
This study evaluates the insurance-like effects of brand equity and corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the financial value of firms affected by Chinese product-harm crises. It also explores how socio-cognition influences insurance mechanisms within this collectivist society. The results find that the financial losses of a crisis are contingent upon its severity, with less serious events failing to generate meaningful valuation declines. Both brand equity and CSR can mitigate financial losses and offer insurance-like protections for affected firms. However, CSR demonstrates a stronger insurance-like effect on financial value because of the socio-cognition in this collectivist society. The findings presented herein support the argument that cultural socio-cognition can contribute to investor judgments and provide a theoretical basis for understanding the role of cultural socio-cognition in insurance mechanisms. In doing so, this study validates the distinct insurance-like effects of brand equity and CSR on financial value, while establishing cultural socio-cognition as a moderating factor in risk management, thereby expanding the theoretical boundaries of risk management. Additionally, it offers practical guidance for firms operating in diverse markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: