This work uncovers bipartite graphs in Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena theory, indicating hidden symmetries in squared amplitudes.
We define the “squared amplitudes” in planar Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena theory, analogous to those in <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mrow> <a:mi mathvariant="script">N</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>4</a:mn> </a:mrow> </a:math> super-Yang-Mills (SYM) theory. Surprisingly, the <d:math xmlns:d="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <d:mrow> <d:mi>n</d:mi> </d:mrow> </d:math> -point <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <f:mi>L</f:mi> </f:math> -loop integrands with fixed <h:math xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <h:mrow> <h:mi>N</h:mi> <h:mo>≔</h:mo> <h:mi>n</h:mi> <h:mo>+</h:mo> <h:mi>L</h:mi> </h:mrow> </h:math> are unified in a single generating function. Similar to the SYM four-point half–Bogomol’nyi-Prasad-Sommerfield correlator integrand, the generating function enjoys a hidden <j:math xmlns:j="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <j:msub> <j:mi>S</j:mi> <j:mi>N</j:mi> </j:msub> </j:math> permutation symmetry in the dual space, allowing us to write it as a linear combination of weight-3 planar <l:math xmlns:l="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <l:mi>f</l:mi> </l:math> graphs. Remarkably, through Gram identities it can also be represented as a linear combination of “bipartite” <n:math xmlns:n="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <n:mi>f</n:mi> </n:math> graphs that manifest the important property that no odd-multiplicity amplitude exists in the theory. The generating function and these properties are explicitly checked against squared amplitudes for all <p:math xmlns:p="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <p:mi>n</p:mi> </p:math> with <r:math xmlns:r="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <r:mi>N</r:mi> <r:mo>=</r:mo> <r:mn>4</r:mn> </r:math> , 6, 8. By drawing analogies with SYM, we conjecture some “graphical rules” the generating function satisfies, and exploit them to bootstrap a unique <t:math xmlns:t="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <t:mi>N</t:mi> <t:mo>=</t:mo> <t:mn>10</t:mn> </t:math> result, which provides new results for <v:math xmlns:v="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <v:mi>n</v:mi> <v:mo>=</v:mo> <v:mn>10</v:mn> </v:math> squared tree amplitudes, as well as integrands for <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <x:mrow> <x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo> <x:mi>n</x:mi> <x:mo>,</x:mo> <x:mi>L</x:mi> <x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo> <x:mo>=</x:mo> <x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo> <x:mn>4</x:mn> <x:mo>,</x:mo> <x:mn>6</x:mn> <x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo> <x:mo>,</x:mo> <x:mo stretchy="false">(</x:mo> <x:mn>6</x:mn> <x:mo>,</x:mo> <x:mn>4</x:mn> <x:mo stretchy="false">)</x:mo> </x:mrow> </x:math> . Our results strongly suggest the existence of a “bipartite correlator” in Aharony-Bergman-Jafferis-Maldacena theory that unifies all squared amplitudes and satisfies physical constraints underlying these graphical rules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
He et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: