Observational analysis reveals that temperature and X-ray emission vary significantly in the circumgalactic medium, indicating refinement of AGN feedback models is necessary.
Current cosmological simulations rely on active galactic nucleus (AGN) feedback to quench star formation and match observed stellar mass distributions, but models for AGN feedback are poorly constrained. The circumgalactic medium (CGM) provides a valuable laboratory to study this process, as its metallicity, temperature, and density distributions are directly shaped by AGN activity. Recent observations from the eROSITA instrument provide constraints on the CGM through measurements of extended soft X-ray emission. In this work, we generate synthetic eROSITA observations from the EAGLE and SIMBA cosmological simulations and compare them to observations of galaxies stacked by stellar mass, halo mass, and star formation rate. SIMBA outperforms EAGLE in matching observed surface brightness profiles, but neither simulation achieves consistent agreement with observations across the full range of galaxy properties we studied. We find that variations in CGM X-ray emission between simulations are primarily driven by density differences at R ≲ 0.2 R 200 c and temperature and metallicity changes at larger radii. These results highlight the need for further refinement of AGN feedback models in cosmological simulations and demonstrate the power of stacked X-ray observations as a tool for constraining feedback physics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grayson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: