Mixed-methods study reveals gaps in language proficiency expectations in U.S. translation and interpreting programs, suggesting need for curriculum alignment.
This article examines the relationship between language proficiency and translation and interpreting (T&I) education in U.S. programs, focusing on language preparedness and development. This mixed-methods study investigates course prerequisites, proficiency requirements, and perceptions of administrators and instructors regarding students’ expected versus observed proficiency levels. Findings reveal a mismatch between expected and average proficiency when entering a program, with both groups acknowledging that T&I courses contribute to students’ language development but noting that current program practices often fail to align students’ actual proficiency with their needs. At the graduate level, instructors criticize proficiency requirements, and some administrators continue to view translator training as distinct from language teaching, reflecting issues related to program identity and adherence to professional norms. The study highlights a lack of articulation between prerequisite courses and introductory T&I courses, with misaligned proficiency guidelines and unrealistic expectations. The article concludes with recommendations for improving T&I program design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ciller et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: