Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Response highlights ethical considerations and student well-being outcomes with mental health chatbots, suggesting a commitment to scientific integrity.
This reply addresses concerns raised in the Matters Arising letter, emphasizing the rigor of our empirical study on student well-being outcomes with ISAs. We clarify methodological decisions, address speculative claims regarding Replika's marketing and usage, and highlight our study's focus on peer-reviewed, evidence-based findings. Ethical considerations and potential conflicts of interest are transparently discussed, reinforcing our commitment to scientific integrity and advancing knowledge in the field of AI and mental health.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maples et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: