Surveys reveal how identity exploration affects ethnic self-labeling in second-generation Asian Americans, suggesting distinct label usage patterns.
Ethnic/racial self-labeling reflects individuals’ self-perceptions and group affiliations. Using survey and interview data from 63 second-generation Asian American emerging adults, this study examined the breadth (number) and depth (personal significance) of self-labels across identity statuses defined by exploration and commitment. Results show that self-labeling varied by identity status where the Unexamined group favored ethnic-American labels tied to socially recognizable markers, the Achieved group used labels reflecting integrated, nuanced identities, and the Moratorium group adopted diverse labels, highlighting active exploration. These findings expand prior work on ethnic/racial self-labeling elaboration by illustrating how both internal identity processes and sociocultural influences shape label breadth and depth.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: