Framework demonstrates robust object detection and data processing in assistive technology, improving quality of life in visually impaired individuals.
In recent decades, various assistive technologies have emerged to support visually impaired individuals. However, there remains a gap in terms of solutions that provide efficient, universal, and real-time capabilities by combining robust object detection, robust communication, continuous data processing, and emergency signaling in dynamic environments. In many existing systems, trade-offs are made in range, latency, or reliability when applied in changing outdoor or indoor scenarios. In this study, we propose a comprehensive framework specifically tailored for visually impaired people, integrating computer vision, edge computing, and a dual-channel communication architecture including low-power wide-area network (LPWAN) technology. The system utilizes the YOLOv5 deep-learning model for the real-time detection of obstacles, paths, and assistive tools (such as the white cane) with high performance: precision 0.988, recall 0.969, and mAP 0.985. Implementation of edge-computing devices is introduced to offload computational load from central servers, enabling fast local processing and decision-making. The communications subsystem uses Wi-Fi as the primary link, while a LoRaWAN channel acts as a fail-safe emergency alert network. An IoT-based panic button is incorporated to transmit immediate location-tagged alerts, enabling rapid response by authorities or caregivers. The experimental results demonstrate the system’s low latency and reliable operations under varied real-world conditions, indicating significant potential to improve independent mobility and quality of life for visually impaired people. The proposed solution offers cost-effective and scalable architecture suitable for deployment in complex and challenging environments where real-time assistance is essential.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alwakid et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: