Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study demonstrates improved tumor ablation in models using pulsed lasers and photosensitizers, indicating enhanced treatment efficacy and reduced normal tissue damage.
FLASH therapies are attracting tremendous interest because they spare normal tissues while maintaining tumor‐destroying efficacy, when compared with continuous delivery of radiation. In Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), it has been noted that continuous‐wave and pulsed lasers give comparable results for a variety of tumors, but the conditions for increased tumor‐to‐peritumoral tissue selectivity have never been reported. This work presents a model that explains how pulsed lasers, in combination with photosensitizers, can offer selective and in‐depth tumor ablation. It is shown that the photosensitizer absorption must be saturated to obtain the FLASH effect. The importance of the number of laser pulses to destroy tumor tissue and spare normal tissue is demonstrated. The predictions of the model and the superiority of FLASH‐PDT are validated with the treatment of subcutaneous CT26 and orthotopic 4T1 tumors models. Notably, FLASH‐PDT with redaporfin significantly increases the overall survival of mice with 4 mm orthotopic 4T1 tumors and lung metastasis. FLASH‐PDT allows for the use of order‐of‐magnitude higher drug or light doses without affecting healthy tissues, while promoting selective and deeper tumor treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arnaut et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: