Key result
Elevated Lp(a) linked to ~106% higher risk of bioprosthetic structural valve degeneration after AVR.
Why the study?
Does elevated Lipoprotein(a) increase the risk of structural valve degeneration in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves?
Cohort (n=174)
Does elevated Lipoprotein(a) increase the risk of structural valve degeneration in patients with bioprosthetic aortic valves?
Hazard Ratio: 2.06 (95% CI 1.09–3.91)
Absolute Event Rate: 62% vs 47%
p-value: p=0.026
Elevated Lipoprotein(a) is independently associated with long-term structural valve degeneration of aortic bioprostheses, suggesting a potential role for Lp(a)-lowering therapies to improve valve durability.
Aims Structural valve degeneration (SVD) is the leading cause of late bioprosthetic valve failure. Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] contributes to native aortic valve calcification, but its role in SVD is unclear. We investigated whether elevated Lp(a) is associated with SVD after bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (AVR), and whether this differs between stenotic and regurgitant phenotypes. Methods and results We studied 174 bioprosthetic AVR patients with available Lp(a) levels over a median echocardiographic follow-up of 7.3 years (1,372 studies). SVD was defined by VARC-3 criteria, and associations were analyzed with Fine–Gray competing risk models. Lp(a) was evaluated categorically (≤ or > 125 nmol/L) and continuously using spline modeling. During follow-up, 40 patients developed SVD (22 stenotic, 9 mixed, 9 regurgitant). The 15-year cumulative incidence was 51% with median onset at 14.8 years. Elevated Lp(a) was associated with higher risk of overall SVD (62% vs 47%; SHR 2.06, 95% CI 1.09–3.91; p=0.026) and specifically with stenotic/mixed phenotypes (SHR 2.57, 95% CI 1.26–5.23; p=0.009). No association was observed with regurgitant phenotypes (SHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.19–3.92; p=0.84). After multivariable adjustment, elevated Lp(a) remained an independent predictor of stenotic/mixed SVD (adjusted SHR 3.00, 95% CI 1.48–6.07; p=0.002). Spline modeling showed a linear dose–response, with each 25 nmol/L increase in Lp(a) conferring 13% higher risk. Conclusion Elevated Lp(a) is independently associated with long-term risk of stenotic/mixed SVD. These findings highlight Lp(a) as a promising biomarker of prosthetic valve vulnerability and support investigation of emerging Lp(a)-lowering therapies to improve valve durability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boute et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (n=174). Elevated Lipoprotein(a) (> 125 nmol/L) vs. Lipoprotein(a) ≤ 125 nmol/L was evaluated on Overall structural valve degeneration (SVD) (SHR 2.06, 95% CI 1.09-3.91, p=0.026). Elevated Lipoprotein(a) (>125 nmol/L) was associated with a higher risk of overall structural valve degeneration after bioprosthetic AVR (62% vs 47%; SHR 2.06; 95% CI 1.09-3.91; p=0.026).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: