Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective analysis shows assisted liquefaction impacts motile sperm recovery in IUI and IVF, indicating similar pregnancy outcomes as traditional methods.
Background/Objectives: Efficient sperm separation is critical for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART). This study evaluates how assisted liquefaction (AL), a faster sperm preparation technique, affects motile sperm recovery and ART outcomes. Methods: A prospective pair analysis to address the efficiency of AL and retrospective cohort analysis of IUI and IVF/ICSI cycles were performed. Results: The average time to perform AL was 3 min, in comparison to the 15 to 30 min for traditional liquefaction (TL) until initiating sperm preparation. The total motility (p = 0.252) and progressive motility (p = 0.227) of the sperm samples were about 4% higher in the AL group although there was no significant difference. No significant differences were observed between AL and TL in fertilization (80.0% vs. 81.9%, p = 0.297), blastocyst rates (48.2% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.595), positive pregnancy (70.5% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.667), clinical pregnancy (65.9% vs. 68.4%, p = 0.841), or live birth (52.3% vs. 51.3%, p = 0.831) outcomes in IVF. The Positive pregnancy (p = 0.669) and clinical pregnancy (p = 0.841) of IUI were not significantly different between both groups. Conclusions: AL offers similar results to TL while reducing preparation time without interrupting ART outcomes. AL may have benefit to asthenozoospermia cases for ART due to reduced exposure time of sperm to semen that may prevent sperm quality impact.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: