Empirical analysis shows that joint ventures significantly enhance shareholder value through strategic guidance on partner selection, indicating strong market responses.
Purpose This study empirically examines how industrial diversification and partner business relatedness influence shareholder value, focusing on US multinational enterprises’ (MNEs) worldwide joint venture (JV) announcements, with particular emphasis on East Asian economies. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on theories from finance, strategic management and international business, we apply a standard event study methodology and employ three parametric and nonparametric tests (i.e. the Patell Z-test, the rank test and the generalized sign test) to assess the impact. We calculate abnormal returns (ARs) as the difference between actual and expected returns and average them across firms to obtain the average AR for each day in the [−10, +10] window, thereby capturing potential information leakage before JV announcement and delayed market reactions afterward (Brown and Warner, 1985; Fama, 1998). Findings We find robust evidence of a diversification premium, confirming that diversification through IJVs increases shareholder value for US partners and partnering with businesses in unrelated industries can amplify the value gains from diversification. Practical implications The findings suggest that IJVs can be a more effective entry mode than acquisitions or greenfield investments when MNEs expand into non-core business areas, offering strategic guidance for both investment mode choice and partner selection. Social implications Our findings have important implications for firms’ investment mode and partner selection decisions when they expand internationally. Originality/value To the best of our knowledge, this study is among the first to systematically investigate the combined effects of industrial diversification and partner business relatedness on shareholder value in the context of US firms undertaking IJV investments in East Asian economies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: