Analysis shows that low BK viremia impacts cytokine production in kidney transplant recipients, suggesting new diagnostic markers.
Background BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) infection following kidney transplantation results from over-suppression of cellular immunity. Currently, there is no established, clinically applicable immunological assay that comprehensively monitors cellular immune responses against BKPyV, incorporating both cytokine production and T cell activation markers. Our study aimed to comprehensively assess both cytokine production and surface activation markers to differentiate kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with low-level (<3,000 copies/mL) BKPyV viremia from those without viremia. Methods Thirty-six participants were enrolled, comprising KTR with (BK) and without BKPyV viremia (nBK), alongside healthy controls (HC). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were stimulated using BKPyV viral capsid protein-1 (VP1) or large-T-antigen (LTA), with and without CD28/CD49d co-stimulatory antibodies. Outcomes included expression of IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, CD25, CD134, CD137, and CD154. Candidate markers were evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for diagnosing BKPyV viremia. Results VP1- or LTA-stimulated CD4 + and CD8 + T cells showed optimal discriminatory power between BK and nBK groups when co-stimulated with CD28/CD49d. VP1-stimulated CD4 + cells differed significantly between groups in IL-2, TNF-α, CD25, and CD137, while CD8 + cells differed significantly in IFN-γ and CD25. LTA-stimulated CD4 + cells showed significant differences in TNF-α and CD25, and CD8 + cells differed significantly in IFN-γ and CD25. LTA-stimulated CD4 + CD25 + and CD8 + IFN-γ + cells provided significant AUROC values (0.823, 95%CI 0.657–0.989, p = 0.030; and 0.833, 95%CI 0.678–0.989, p = 0.028, respectively) at a cutoff of > 0.2% positive cells. Conclusion LTA-stimulated CD4 + CD25 + and CD8 + IFN-γ + T cells differentiated KTR with and without low-level BKPyV viremia, representing promising markers for early clinical diagnostics and future studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saisorn et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: